[1551] For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
Or, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
Yes.
Or, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned for that person there?
For the non-returner (anāgāmī), in the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu), the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned for him there, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned; for that same person, in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in the two feelings (vedanā), the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned for him there, but it is not the case that the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned for him there. For three persons, in the form element and in the formless element, the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned for them there, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned; for those same persons, in the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings, both the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual lust are unabandoned for them there.
For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
For two persons, in the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings, the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned for them there, but it is not the case that the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned for them there; for the worldling (puthujjana), in the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings, both the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of doubt are unabandoned for him there.
Or, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned for that person there?
For the worldling, in painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), in the form element, and in the formless element, the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned for him there, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned; for that same person, in the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings, both the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of sensual lust are unabandoned for him there.
For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
Or, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of lust for existence is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned.
For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
Yes.
Or, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of sensual lust unabandoned for that person there?
For the non-returner, in painful feeling, in the form element, and in the formless element, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned for him there, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned; for that same person, in the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned for him there, but it is not the case that the latent tendency of sensual lust is unabandoned for him there. For three persons, in painful feeling, in the form element, and in the formless element, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned for them there, but the latent tendency of sensual lust should not be said to be either abandoned or unabandoned; for those same persons, in the sense-sphere element, in the two feelings, both the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of sensual lust are unabandoned for them there.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.