[1550] Where the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya), the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya), the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya), the latent tendency of view (diṭṭhānusaya), the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya), and the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) are unabandoned, is the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) unabandoned there?
There is none.
Or rather, where the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned, are the latent tendency of sensual lust, the latent tendency of repulsion, the latent tendency of conceit, the latent tendency of view, the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of lust for existence unabandoned there?
In the form element (rūpadhātu) and in the formless element (arūpadhātu) — here the latent tendency of ignorance, the latent tendency of conceit, the latent tendency of view, the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of lust for existence are unabandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said to be either 'abandoned' or 'unabandoned'. In the two feelings (vedanā) in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu) — here the latent tendency of ignorance, the latent tendency of sensual lust, the latent tendency of conceit, the latent tendency of view, and the latent tendency of doubt are unabandoned; the latent tendency of repulsion and the latent tendency of lust for existence should not be said to be either 'abandoned' or 'unabandoned'. In painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā) — here the latent tendency of ignorance, the latent tendency of repulsion, the latent tendency of view, and the latent tendency of doubt are unabandoned; the latent tendency of sensual lust, the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of lust for existence should not be said to be either 'abandoned' or 'unabandoned'.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.