[1518] For whomever and wherever the latent tendency of sensual lust (kāmarāgānusaya) has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) been abandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned.
Or, for whomever and wherever the latent tendency of repulsion has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of sensual lust been abandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned.
For whomever and wherever the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) been abandoned for that person there?
For the non-returner (anāgāmī), in two feelings (vedanā) in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned for him there, but the latent tendency of conceit has not been abandoned for him there. For the Arahant, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned and the latent tendency of conceit has been abandoned for him there.
Or, for whomever and wherever the latent tendency of conceit has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of sensual lust been abandoned for that person there?
For the Arahant, in the form element (rūpadhātu), in the formless element (arūpadhātu), the latent tendency of conceit has been abandoned for him there; of the latent tendency of sensual lust it should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned. For that same person, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of conceit has been abandoned and the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned for him there.
For whomever and wherever the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) been abandoned for that person there?
Yes.
Or, for whomever and wherever the latent tendency of views has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of sensual lust been abandoned for that person there?
For two persons, in painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), in the form element, in the formless element, the latent tendency of views has been abandoned for them there; of the latent tendency of sensual lust it should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned. For those same persons, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of views has been abandoned for them there, but the latent tendency of sensual lust has not been abandoned for them there. For two persons, in painful feeling, in the form element, in the formless element, the latent tendency of views has been abandoned for them there; of the latent tendency of sensual lust it should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned. For those same persons, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of views has been abandoned and the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned for them there.
For whomever and wherever the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) been abandoned for that person there?
Yes.
Or, for whomever and wherever the latent tendency of doubt has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of sensual lust been abandoned for that person there?
For two persons, in painful feeling, in the form element, in the formless element, the latent tendency of doubt has been abandoned for them there; of the latent tendency of sensual lust it should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned. For those same persons, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of doubt has been abandoned for them there, but the latent tendency of sensual lust has not been abandoned for them there. For two persons, in painful feeling, in the form element, in the formless element, the latent tendency of doubt has been abandoned for them there; of the latent tendency of sensual lust it should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned. For those same persons, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of doubt has been abandoned and the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned for them there.
For whomever and wherever the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) been abandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned.
Or, for whomever and wherever the latent tendency of lust for existence has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of sensual lust been abandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned.
For whomever and wherever the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) been abandoned for that person there?
For the non-returner, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned for him there, but the latent tendency of ignorance has not been abandoned for him there. For the Arahant, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned and the latent tendency of ignorance has been abandoned for him there.
Or, for whomever and wherever the latent tendency of ignorance has been abandoned, has the latent tendency of sensual lust been abandoned for that person there?
For the Arahant, in painful feeling, in the form element, in the formless element, the latent tendency of ignorance has been abandoned for him there; of the latent tendency of sensual lust it should not be said either that it has been abandoned or that it has not been abandoned. For that same person, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, the latent tendency of ignorance has been abandoned and the latent tendency of sensual lust has been abandoned for him there.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.