[1552] For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of repulsion (paṭighānusaya) is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of conceit (mānānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it is abandoned or that it is unabandoned.
Or rather, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of conceit is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it is abandoned or that it is unabandoned.
For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of views (diṭṭhānusaya) … the latent tendency of doubt (vicikicchānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
For two persons, in painful feeling (dukkhā vedanā), the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned for them there, but it is not the case that the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned for them there. For the ordinary person (puthujjana), in painful feeling, both the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned and the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned for that person there.
Or rather, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned for that person there?
For the ordinary person, in two feelings (vedanā) in the sense-sphere element (kāmadhātu), in the form element (rūpadhātu), and in the formless element (arūpadhātu), the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned for that person there; the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said either to be abandoned or to be unabandoned. For that same person, in painful feeling, both the latent tendency of doubt is unabandoned and the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned for that person there.
For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of lust for existence (bhavarāgānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it is abandoned or that it is unabandoned.
Or rather, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of lust for existence is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned for that person there?
It should not be said either that it is abandoned or that it is unabandoned.
For whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of ignorance (avijjānusaya) unabandoned for that person there?
Yes.
Or rather, for whomever, wherever, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned, is the latent tendency of repulsion unabandoned for that person there?
For the non-returner (anāgāmī), in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, in the form element, and in the formless element, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned for that person there; the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said either to be abandoned or to be unabandoned. For that same person, in painful feeling, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned for that person there, but it is not the case that the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned for that person there. For three persons, in two feelings in the sense-sphere element, in the form element, and in the formless element, the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned for them there; the latent tendency of repulsion should not be said either to be abandoned or to be unabandoned. For those same persons, in painful feeling, both the latent tendency of ignorance is unabandoned and the latent tendency of repulsion is unabandoned for them there.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.