[543] A phenomenon (dhamma) that is both a defilement (kilesa) and subject to defilement (saṅkilesika) is a condition, by object condition (ārammaṇa-paccaya), for a phenomenon that is both a defilement and subject to defilement:
With defilements as object, aggregates (khandhā) that are defilements arise.
The root [should be repeated]: with defilements as object, aggregates that are subject to defilement but not defilements arise.
The root [should be repeated]: with defilements as object, defilements and the aggregates associated (sampayuttaka) with them arise.
A phenomenon that is subject to defilement but not a defilement is a condition, by object condition, for a phenomenon that is subject to defilement but not a defilement:
Giving (dāna) … virtue (sīla) … the uposatha observance (uposathakamma) … what was formerly well practiced … having emerged from jhāna, one reviews the jhāna, relishes it, and delights in it; with that as object, lust (rāga) arises, restlessness (uddhacca) …
When the jhāna has declined, grief (domanassa) arises in one who is remorseful.
The noble ones review change-of-lineage (gotrabhū); they review cleansing (vodāna).
The eye … the base (vatthu) … the aggregates that are subject to defilement but not defilements, as impermanent … grief arises.
With the divine eye … [it] is a condition, by object condition, for adverting (āvajjana).
The other two are similar to the defilement dyad (kilesa-duka). The object-combinations (ghaṭanā), too, are similar to the defilement dyad.
English translation from the Pali (Siam Raṭṭha edition) — under review, not for citation.